![]() ![]() Agree that the theme of possession has been done so many times, right from The exorcist to The rite. I thot even Hashmi was doing some mumbo jumbo magic like what Sharmaan did in 1920 London. At first even I thot that the twist might be the same as 1920 London's. At least the plot of Raaz reboot was bearable. The editing was better than 1920 London n the songs of Raaz reboot were much better than 1920 London. Some of the scenes of Romania were well shot n it had that creepy feel to it. The cinematography in Raaz reboot was good. The Bhatts n T- series r the producers n of course it has Hashmi who is born to play such roles effortlessly. ![]() Whereas Vikram directed Raaz reboot himself. Even the costumes of Sharmaan n others were laughable. It had awful set locations, fake deserts n mansions, bad direction by some Desai, awful songs n unknown producers. Vikram Bhatt jus wrote the story of 1920 London. It is not a Raaz reboot, it's basically a reboot of Sharman Joshis 1920 London, which was pathetic n laughable. I saw this film in theatre with my family. Reviewed by Fella_shibby 7 / 10 It ain't no reboot of Raaz but another version of 1920 London. Rehaan and Shaina are newly married as Rehaan gets a job offer as a Venture Capitalist for the East European Finance Company they had actually fallen in love in Romania,Shaina insists Rehan to take up the job while Rehan is reluctant a she has a secret to hide in Romania,Shaina soon experiences paranormal activities but Rehan refuses to believe while on a business trip Rehan receives a frantic call from Shaina requesting for help as she is trapped in telephone booth in a rural area where she had gone to seek help on paranormal activities happening around her.Shaina and Rehaan take the help of a local Priest but he cant help them much,Aditya Shrivastava former lover of Shaina comes to rescue her from the evil spirit. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |